Investing and Borrowing

I often meet with organizations and people seeking investment counseling. One of the first steps in personal “investment” counseling is to encourage the contribution of the maximum amount allowed under law to tax-advantaged retirement accounts. If one is already deferring income and reducing taxes, and still has excess reserves, I always recommend paying off DEBTS first.
The only exception to this rule would be mortgage debt, which is usually tax-deductible and carrying a very low interest burden. The logic of this approach is pretty simple. If you already have debt outstanding, essentially you are making interest payments on the “investment” made by someone else. To make personal after-tax investments while still carrying debt burdens owed to others is essentially to have a “margin” account. Margin accounts are widely considered to be ultra-speculative by financial planners. Borrowing someone else’s money to “invest” for yourself implies you are sure you can earn a higher rate of return than the entity that loaned the money to you. In most instances, if you are a borrower, you are pretty much by definition short of investment funds. Aggressive opportunists with big plans often like to use other people's money. However, it is my experience, that aggressive opportunists with big plans, that constantly require other people’s money (OPM), usually implode at some point. Constantly operating on borrowed money is almost always a recipe for financial disaster. Accordingly, I found it financially comical that our president was calling for America to do more "borrowing" for the purpose of “investing” earlier this week in his State of the Union address.
Bernie Madoff
Perhaps I am simplistic. But in the real world, "borrowing" is not investing. Borrowing is using the investment capital of others as a form of financing. There seems to be a great sleight of hand going on here. The “focus group-tested” use of the term “investing” is merely a semantic substitute for the increasingly less popular term, “borrowing.” While it might help conjure up some great vision of a bright future, seasoned investors realize that borrowing even if under a different name, is merely the continuation of the national margin account. America’s government has not been “investing,” America’s government has been on "margin." America is still on margin. Once America is off margin it can think about "investing." You can learn more about margin accounts here:

Share/Bookmark

Greenberg: The Games NPR Plays

Townhall - Paul Greenberg - When it comes to bureaucracies, corporate or public, it's not just jobs that can be delegated but any sense of responsibility. This isn't just a familiar pattern, it's standard operating procedure by now. When the head of the outfit is confronted by a scandal that can no longer be ignored, and the public has grown more outraged than usual, protocol demands that the top exec submit ... somebody else's resignation.
NPR's Vivian Schiller
It could almost be Washington's motto: The buck stops somewhere else. Now it's happened at NPR. Which is one of the many public-private hodgepodges that gets all kinds of funding from all kinds of sources -- and so is hard to pin down when things go embarrassingly wrong. There are more of those around than ever -- Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, Government Motors, AIG, American health care in general ... you name it. Their structure tends to resemble that of a medieval chimera, only without the charm.
Juan Williams
NPR never looked so much like the politically correct fraud it's long been than when it fired Juan Williams, one of its news commentators, for daring to comment on the news -- on FOX yet. It took a while for the suits at national headquarters to come up with some transparent excuse. In this case, Mr. Williams was said to have been hired as an analyst, not a commentator, and so had overstepped his bounds. Read full comun here:

Share/Bookmark

Regent Appointments Will Be Based On "Constitution"

Governor Martinez
LAS CRUCES – Governor Susana Martinez announced today that she has rescinded the executive order establishing a convoluted regent selection process for New Mexico’s public universities. Executive Order 2010-049 established an advisory committee process for the state’s universities, providing additional and unnecessary requirements not specified in the New Mexico Constitution. The Governor issued an executive order overturning those requirements, returning the regent selection process to the one enumerated by the State Constitution. “The New Mexico Constitution provides a sufficient process for selecting regents at our public universities and I will abide by it,” said Governor Martinez. “The advisory committee is just another symbol of big-government excesses that serve little purpose. I believe in the need for a fair regent selection process that is free of politics, but I do not find it necessary to add another layer to an already bloated bureaucracy.” Last summer, the Albuquerque Journal editorialized against the regent selection process as “one more quasi-governmental bureaucracy” that would “water down accountability. Last week, the University of New Mexico Faculty Senate approved a proposal that would water down that accountability by creating a committee that would recommend three names to the governor whenever a regent's position opens at UNM, New Mexico State University or New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology…There's no question faculty and community input is a good thing...But the process should not be institutionalized by creating one more quasi-governmental bureaucracy.” (“Leave Regent Decision Up to Next Governor,” Albuquerque Journal Editorial, 8/29/10).

Share/Bookmark