Elder: Obama......Job Killer

From Townhall.com - by Larry Elder - President Barack Obama walked into the Oval Office in January 2009 during a severe economic downturn led by a meltdown in housing prices -- and promptly made things worse. By bailing out banks, insurance companies and auto firms -- done to a lesser extent by the previous administration -- Obama rewarded poor performers and punished their better-managed competitors. Prevented from pouncing on wounded rivals and thus increasing market share or buying the assets of the wounded at fire sale prices, Ford, for example, watched GM and Chrysler get a cash infusion from taxpayers. Despite GM's recent "successful" public offering, taxpayers lost billions of dollars. Obama and the Democratic congressional supermajorities passed a nearly trillion-dollar economic "stimulus" package and then proceeded to award fiscally irresponsible states with "stimulus" funds, helping postpone the day of reckoning when states must meet their budgets by reducing spending and cutting the size of government. Stimulus supposedly "saved or created" 3.5 million jobs, but it merely succeeded in transferring money from the pockets of producer taxpayers into the pockets of others. Read full column here:
Share/Bookmark

1 comments:

Anonymous said...

It's hard to criticize a guy who invests in "sagging" industries. Our beloved governor, Bill Richardson, is often quoted as having said that we SHOULD BE investing in sagging industries. Maybe it's just me but, this seems like very sound economic policy. Too bad Big Bill couldn't have run again. Fiscal restraint and austerity is a recipe for a deliberate slow down in government spending. What we need is MORE spending and debt. This will result in the government needing to hire more people which will result in higher tax revenues collected from the increase in government employees. Sure...maybe privately owned business will have to close their doors but in the long run this will be better. If we can borrow more all of us will get more government benefits. I can't think of a more popular policy than to increase the public's entitlements.

Post a Comment