UN Agreement Should Have Gun Owners Up In Arms

From forbes.com -Under the guise of a proposed global “Small Arms Treaty” premised to fight “terrorism”, “insurgency” and “international crime syndicates” you can be quite certain that an even more insidious threat is being targeted – our Constitutional right for law-abiding citizens to own and bear arms. What, exactly, does the intended agreement entail? While the terms have yet to be made public, if passed by the U.N. and ratified by our Senate, it will almost certainly force the U.S. to: Enact tougher licensing requirements, creating additional bureaucratic red tape for legal firearms ownership. Confiscate and destroy all “unauthorized” civilian firearms (exempting those owned by our government of course).  More News New Mexico
Share/Bookmark

1 comments:

Anonymous said...

So what's the problem? IF this happens, THEN that happens, it will "almost certainly" mean that people who SHOULDN'T BE ALLOWED to own guns, and are NOT licensed to, won't get to keep theirs?

AND: Civilian firearms, by definition, exempts those owned by the government.

But, if it makes you feel better, panic anyway.

Post a Comment