The Senate Judiciary Committee on Feb. 6 initially voted to table the bill. Normally that means a bill will never again see the light of day for the rest of the session. But then Wirth, D-Santa Fe, agreed to craft a substitute bill answering some of the concerns of the bill’s opponents. On Feb. 18, the Judiciary Committee gave a do-pass recommendation to the new version of the bill on a 6-2 vote. Telephone companies AT&T and Verizon have testified that they support SB 17. The only opposition at the Judiciary Committee came from the New Mexico Criminal Defense Lawyers Association.
But if that seemed like a miraculous comeback for SB 17, it soon became apparent that the bill’s newfound momentum would be short-lived. The bill has been sitting on the lower end of the Senate floor calendar every day for nearly two weeks. But SB 17 has not been moving its way up the agenda, getting closer to the top as other bills get debated. Just the opposite. Last week, the bill was No. 28 on the calendar. On Monday, it had sunk to No. 38. By Tuesday, it wasn’t even in the top 40 anymore. It was No. 50.
According to Senate rules, bills that make it through the committee process don’t get heard on the floor in the order they come out of committee. The agenda is the responsibility of the majority floor leader, Sen. Michael Sanchez, D-Belen. Concerning SB 17, Sanchez has not made a secret of his opposition. He was one of the two members of the Judiciary Committee to vote against the latest version of the bill. Sanchez, a lawyer, has been consistent throughout his career in the Senate in his opposition to imposing stricter penalties for crimes. Read more
0 comments:
Post a Comment