 |
| Marita Noon |
On July 28, the Globe and Mail, updated a report that indicates that melting ice—which is supposedly causing the polar-bear drownings—is not caused by global warming. Instead, Canadian scientists found that ice is melting more quickly than the predictions and it is melting due to varied salt levels in the older ice versus the younger ice. Simon Boxall of the Catlin Artic Survey explained that it is a more complicated process than simple warming. “Because fresh meltwater is colder than seawater, that means relatively warm water is being forced upwards. And that may be part of the reason that sea ice is melting so much faster than anyone thought it would.”
In the same week that the misconduct investigation was announced and the sea ice report was updated, The University of Alabama issued a press release heralding new findings from NASA’s Terra satellite. In short, as reported in Forbes, “The study indicates far less future global warming will occur than United Nations computer models have predicted, and supports prior studies indicating increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide trap far less heat than alarmists have claimed.” Another assumption bites the dust. Unfortunately, billions of dollars of taxpayer money have already been spent in questionable projects resulting in a campaign to promote expensive ethanol, wind, and solar energy to fix a problem that doesn’t appear to exist. Add these news items—all from just one week—to the climategate scandal, the overall lack of warming, and other predictions from the alarmists that have not been borne out, and one has to wonder how the alarmists can still believe. More and more, the American public is hitting the snooze button, and it is the alarmists who should be alarmed. It looks like they will have to find a new clarion call—a new way to spread fear, and a new way to restrict energy and control freedom. Read full column here: News New Mexico
Posts
2 comments:
Gee...another environmentalist liar? OMG! Tell us it isn't so. NEWS FLASH - the word "environmentalist" and "liars" are rapidly becoming commonly used words in a sentence. We have spotted owl lie Oregon and a litany of other fabrications associated with environmental activists blaming humans for everything that ails the animal kingdom and the world. They've been beaten back so badly that NOW they've resorted to characterizing the changing of the seasons and unusual weather as, "climate change". I think it's about time that economic victims of environmental group's false claims should have the right to recover damages. Environmental group's assets should be frozen so that law suits against these organizations can go forward and funds can be made available to compensate the victims. We can start with people who have lost a home to forest fires that could have been controlled or prevented had fuel harvesting techniques not been stopped by environmental groups. Their leaders should be held personally and financially accountable. People like Al Gore ,who ride in private jets around the world, should be legally liable for the economic damage they cause with their false scientific claims. I just KNOW there are plenty of lawyers who would love to sue the deep pockets of these types of individuals and environmental groups. How's that for equal justice?
Why can't victims of environmental group false claims sue these groups?
Post a Comment