Five ATF officials found responsible for Fast and Furious

U. S. Representative Darrell Issa
Exclusive from the Los Angles Times - By Richard A. Serrano - WASHINGTON -- Republican congressional investigators have concluded that five senior ATF officials -- from the special agent-in-charge of the Phoenix field office to the top man in the bureau’s Washington headquarters -- are collectively responsible for the failed Fast and Furious gun-tracking operation that was “marred by missteps, poor judgments and inherently reckless strategy.” The investigators, in a final report likely to be released later this week, also unearthed new evidence that agents from the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives in Phoenix initially sought to hide from the Mexican government the crucial information that two Fast and Furious firearms were recovered after the brother of a Mexican state attorney general was killed there. According to a copy of the report obtained Monday by The Times, the investigators said their findings are “the best information available as of now” about the flawed gun operation that last month led to Atty. Gen. Eric H. Holder Jr. being found in contempt of Congress for failing to turn over subpoenaed documents. Two more final reports, they said, will deal with “the devastating failure of supervision and leadership” at the Department of Justice and an “unprecedented obstruction of the [congressional] investigation by the highest levels of the Justice Department, including the attorney general himself.” Read more

Share/Bookmark

Sowell: Big Lies in Politics

Commentary by Thomas Sowell - It was either Adolf Hitler or his propaganda minister, Joseph Goebbels, who said that the people will believe any lie, if it is big enough and told often enough, loud enough. Although the Nazis were defeated in World War II, this part of their philosophy survives triumphantly to this day among politicians, and nowhere more so than during election years. Perhaps the biggest lie of this election year, and the one likely to be repeated the most often, is that the income of "the rich" is going up, while other people's incomes are going down. If you listen to Barack Obama, you are bound to hear this lie repeatedly. But the government's own Congressional Budget Office has just published a report whose statistics flatly contradict this claim. The CBO report shows that, while the average household income fell 12 percent between 2007 and 2009, the average for the lower four-fifths fell by 5 percent or less, while the average income for households in the top fifth fell 18 percent. For households in the "top one percent" that seems to fascinate so many people, income fell by 36 percent in those same years. Read column

Share/Bookmark

Three US livestock groups seek drought relief with ethanol waiver

The price of corn, the primary ingredient in livestock feed, hit a record $8.1775 a bushel Monday. Photo: ANDY MANIS / APReutersHard-hit U.S. livestock and poultry producers petitioned the government on Monday to reduce or cancel the required use of ethanol in gasoline for a year, asking for "a little help" to ride out the worst drought in 56 years. The request for a first-ever waiver from the federal Environmental Protection Agency's mandate, which in essence requires that more than a third of the U.S. corn harvest be converted into ethanol, comes as grain prices have surged to record highs, driving up feed costs and squeezing profits for producers. "We are having trouble buying corn... it's really putting a burden on our operations and many others across the nation," says J.D. Alexander, president of the National Cattlemen's Beef Association, whose Nebraska feedlot is about half full of cattle. "It's time to wean the ethanol industry and let it stand on its own." The EPA has not granted a waiver since the Renewable Fuels Standard (RFS) was enacted in 2007. The policy has enjoyed years of staunch bipartisan support, boosting income for U.S. farmers and helping reduce the country's dependence on foreign oil. But it is now coming under renewed attack. The beef, chicken, pork and turkey trade groups said they had delivered a petition to EPA administrator Lisa Jackson to waive the mandate "in whole or in substantial part" for the remainder of this year and part of next. Read More News New Mexico

Share/Bookmark

Apollo Moon Landing Flags Still Standing, Photos Reveal

Space.com An enduring question ever since the manned moon landings of the 1960s has been: Are the flags planted by the astronauts still standing? Now, lunar scientists say the verdict is in from the latest photos of the moon taken by NASA's Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Camera (LROC): Most do, in fact, still stand. "From the LROC images it is now certain that the American flags are still standing and casting shadows at all of the sites, except Apollo 11," LROC principal investigator Mark Robinson wrote in a blog post today (July 27). "Astronaut Buzz Aldrin reported that the flag was blown over by the exhaust from the ascent engine during liftoff of Apollo 11, and it looks like he was correct!" Each of the six manned Apollo missions that landed on the moon planted an American flag in the lunar dirt. Read More News New Mexico

Share/Bookmark

Lawyers get nearly $3 million from taxpayers in redistricting fight UPDATE: Yikes! Legal fees will actually total more than $5.4 million

Judge Hall
 Capitol Report New Mexico - Update: We received a call from the Legislative Council   Service telling us the legal fees will actually be substantially more than the $3 million figure reported earlier Monday. In fact, the costs will end up being more like $5.4 million — “at least,” the LCS employee said. While the $3 million figure announced by Judge Hall is correct, we have been told the figure does not count:

*$300,000+ settled on for attorneys and costs to the Navajo Nation
*$460,000 in costs for plaintiffs, experts and legal fees
*$894,402 in legislative expenses, research and polling, and
*$800,000+ in expenses for executive offices of the Governor, Lt. Governor and Secretary of State
Adding those figures, the back of the envelope total is more like $5.4 million in legal fees that taxpayers will end up paying. That’s compared to $3.5 million in legal fees after the redistricting court battles of 2001.

Well, it wasn’t as expensive as the last time around but New Mexico taxpayers will still pay almost $3 million for lawyers involved the recent redistricting legal battles. On Monday, retired district judge Jim Hall – the man assigned to hearing the arguments over realigning voting boundaries for the state — announced awards of nearly $3 million in fees for attorneys who represented Democratic, Republican, Native American and Hispanic interests in redistricting trials heard earlier this year. Like all states, New Mexico has to reapportion districts according to the US Census every 10 years. The $3 million figure is an improvement over the $3.5 million that went out to attorneys the last time New Mexico wrestled with the issue in 2001-2002 and there were fears the price tag would be even higher. Ten years ago, then-Gov. Gary Johnson and the legislature couldn’t come to an agreement on redistricting and we saw a replay in this past legislative session when the Democratically-controlled Roundhouse passed a redistricting map over Republican objections. Republican Gov. Susana Martinez vetoed the legislation, sending the battle to court. Read More News New Mexico

Share/Bookmark

Memo to Mitt: Marco Rubio Has Nothing on Susana Martinez

Susana Martinez
Huffington PostCould New Mexico governor Susana Martinez be back in the running as a possible running mate for Mitt Romney? A little-noticed Public Policy poll conducted July 12-15 among registered voters in New Mexico has some national GOP operatives buzzing. The poll found Romney trailing President Obama 49%-44%, with 7% undecided. But when respondents were asked how they felt about a Romney-Martinez pairing against President Obama and Joe Biden, they favored the two tickets equally (45%-45%). That means Martinez might actually help Romney capture a critical swing state in a region rich with Latino voters, which magnifies her potential value. In fact, New Mexico, with just 5 electoral votes, wasn't even supposed to be competitive this year. Obama captured the state handily in 2008, and most observers say New Mexico is trending strongly "blue," just like neighboring Nevada (6 electoral votes), but in sharp contrast to Arizona (11 electoral votes), which has swung GOP for years. Normally, that makes Colorado (9 electoral votes) the most talked-about Southwestern "battleground." But if Romney wins New Mexico on top of Arizona, he won't necessarily need to carry the Centennial State to blunt Obama's momentum. In a presidential election this close, the unexpected "flip" of a single small Blue state could well prove decisive. Read More News New Mexico

Share/Bookmark

Gary Bland Could Be Trouble for The SIC’s Pay-to-Play Lawsuit

Gary Bland
New Mexico WatchdogA man with nothing to lose and a belly full of fight heads the long list of defendants in the State Investment Council’s pay-to-play lawsuit.  With his back against the wall, in a struggle he believes is about clearing his name, Gary Bland is mounting a legal defense that may end up helping all the defendants in the SIC’s complex legal case.  Ironically, the smallest dog in the fight might have the deepest bite. In a previous story–Marc Correra, You’ve Been Served!–we related the exuberant confidence of the SIC’s chief counsel. “We are winning,” he proclaimed in the SIC’s June meeting when reporting on the progress of the litigation. Not so fast, Bland counters.  Here’s his side of the story, and it could mean a major headache for the SIC down the road when it has to prove its case. The SIC’s claims are laid out in its Second Amended Complaint for Money Damages filed in the First Judicial Court of Santa Fe County on February 20, 2012.  The SIC alleges that Bland violated the fiduciary duty he owed to the SIC and its permanent funds as the State Investment Officer during the Bill Richardson Administration by placing investments with managers based on his own “selfish interests and the personal, political and financial interests of politically-connected individuals and their associates.” The political connections, the lawsuit alleges, all go back to former Governor Richardson, who appointed Bland. Personally, through his staff, or through a close associate named Anthony Correra, the suit alleges Richardson used his position to influence or direct Bland to steer investments to his friends and contributors. From that point on, the allegations get more complicated. Read More News New Mexico

Share/Bookmark