data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/725a2/725a2d2ba7dfd9296839f86c62a69cff3ce9a3f9" alt=""
When someone is living on the street but otherwise is not harming anyone, do they have a constitutional right to live on the street? That is so obvious. But what about when someone who dates an obviously inappropriate person? Should there be the department of “She will never love you,” that intervenes. Talk about hard knocks, if you marry the wrong person, it will also be the wrong person to divorce. Should we, as a society intervene?
Light up a cigarette and I would like to read your tea leaves for you but it seems you have a right to harm yourself. Let us consider those who desire to take illegal drugs. Are they mentally ill? Perhaps they do not have a drug problem, they have a thinking problem.
What about those who feel compelled to text and drive? Another thinking problem, or are they mentally ill? We can identify some forms of mental illness, but do we really understand these issues well enough to know the boundaries of mental illness?
So we are back to where I started this column. Having our mentally ill in jails is not a good solution. Letting the mentally ill languish on the streets or in private homes may not be the most sustainable solution for the good of the society as a whole.
I hope New Mexico Governor Susana Martinez and both sides of the political spectrum can come together and find real solutions to the mentally ill challenges of our society. Maybe we should tackle mental illness before we tackle poverty. Maybe curing one would cure the other. Maybe we, as a society, are the ones with a thinking problem. Read full column