From the Huffington Post - by Saul Friedman - I have not yet celebrated the Diamond Jubilee -- the 75th anniversary -- last week of the adoption of Social Security. That's because I suspect President Obama may consider agreeing to a cut in benefits for future retirees, by raising the retirement age, which would be disastrous for them and for his presidency. Once he was against it, but now, as you'll see, we cannot be sure. In his White House proclamation, Obama recalled that in the midst of the Great Depression, 'the Social Security Act brought hope to some of our most vulnerable citizens, giving elderly Americans income security and bringing us closer to President Roosevelt's vision of a nation free from want or fear."He added, "My administration is committed to strengthening...and protecting Social Security as a reliable income source for seniors, workers who develop disabilities and dependents...Let us ensure we continue to preserve this program's original purpose in the 21st century." He didn't say how, but presidential proclamations are usually empty of substance. And as the Associated Press pointed out in reporting on the president's speech, "most Republicans, in fact, are wary of touching that idea because Social Security is virtually sacrosanct to voters, particularly seniors." Indeed, the most prominent Republican favoring privatization of Social Security and Medicare, Rep. Paul Ryan of Wisconsin, has gotten little support from his Republican colleagues.What was missing from Obama's address was a single proposal to solve Social Security's long term shortfall, which the program's trustees estimate will come in 2037, when the program's $2.6 trillion trust fund, which is held in treasury bonds, may run out. According to the trustees, a one percent raise each in the payroll taxes split between employee and employer enacted now, would end the problem. Even now, the trust fund is continuing to grow with interest payments of more than $100 billion a year. Read more
Looks Like Obama Is Considering Cuts in Social Security Benefits
Posted by
Michael Swickard
on Saturday, August 21, 2010
Labels:
Commentary
0
comments
From the Huffington Post - by Saul Friedman - I have not yet celebrated the Diamond Jubilee -- the 75th anniversary -- last week of the adoption of Social Security. That's because I suspect President Obama may consider agreeing to a cut in benefits for future retirees, by raising the retirement age, which would be disastrous for them and for his presidency. Once he was against it, but now, as you'll see, we cannot be sure. In his White House proclamation, Obama recalled that in the midst of the Great Depression, 'the Social Security Act brought hope to some of our most vulnerable citizens, giving elderly Americans income security and bringing us closer to President Roosevelt's vision of a nation free from want or fear."He added, "My administration is committed to strengthening...and protecting Social Security as a reliable income source for seniors, workers who develop disabilities and dependents...Let us ensure we continue to preserve this program's original purpose in the 21st century." He didn't say how, but presidential proclamations are usually empty of substance. And as the Associated Press pointed out in reporting on the president's speech, "most Republicans, in fact, are wary of touching that idea because Social Security is virtually sacrosanct to voters, particularly seniors." Indeed, the most prominent Republican favoring privatization of Social Security and Medicare, Rep. Paul Ryan of Wisconsin, has gotten little support from his Republican colleagues.What was missing from Obama's address was a single proposal to solve Social Security's long term shortfall, which the program's trustees estimate will come in 2037, when the program's $2.6 trillion trust fund, which is held in treasury bonds, may run out. According to the trustees, a one percent raise each in the payroll taxes split between employee and employer enacted now, would end the problem. Even now, the trust fund is continuing to grow with interest payments of more than $100 billion a year. Read more
Washington Times Editorial: The first presumed Muslim president
Posted by
Michael Swickard
Labels:
Commentary
0
comments
Editorial from the Washington Times - Hard on the heels of the Ground Zero Mosque controversy, significant numbers of Americans think President Obama is a Muslim. The uncomfortable fact for the White House is the more the American people get to know Mr. Obama, the more they think he is a follower of Islam. Rumors of Mr. Obama's purported Muslim identity spread in January of 2007 and were tied to Hillary Rodham Clinton operatives, who denied responsibility. The Obama camp responded that "Barack Obama is not and has never been a Muslim. Obama never prayed in a mosque. He has never been a Muslim, was not raised a Muslim and is a committed Christian... But in a February 2008 interview with the New York Times, Mr. Obama said the Adhan, the Muslim call to prayer, is "one of the prettiest sounds on Earth at sunset." He then recited it, "with a first-class [Arabic] accent." The opening of the Adhan contains the Shahada, the Muslim profession of faith, proclaiming, "There is no god but God and Muhammad is the prophet of God." Stating this before two Muslims is the traditional requirement for joining the Islamic faith. Adding fuel to the fire is Mr. Obama's family heritage: born of a Muslim father and raised by a Muslim stepfather. Under Shariah law, having a Muslim father makes one a Muslim, though this custom has no legal standing in the United States. In a September 2008 interview with ABC's George Stephanopoulos, Mr. Obama said, "John McCain has not discussed my Muslim faith," a commen
t which Mr. Obama's partisans say was taken out of context. Suspicions were raised by Obama presidential policies, such as taking a harder line on Israel, ordering that radical Islamic terrorists be referred to only as "violent extremists" and engaging in an unprecedented and obsequious outreach to Muslim countries. Mr. Obama's bowing to King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia, Custodian of the Two Holy Mosques, in April 2009, didn't help matters much. These and other reasons are why perceptions that Mr. Obama is Muslim keep growing. Read more
Washington Times Editorial: The first presumed Muslim president
Why Do Feminists Attack Sarah and Not Sharia?
Posted by
Michael Swickard
Labels:
Commentary
0
comments
By Columnist Doug Giles - Given Islam’s enslavement of women and the Sharia erection of the Cordoba Initiative’s chief con man, Abdul Rauf, you’d think N.O.W. and their ilk would now be raising more Cain about this Ground Zero Mosque than they are about Sarah Palin. Nope, the fems’ fixation remains on Palin. Palin is the threat. Palin is the She Devil. Palin is the one who gets the nasty jabs—and not Islam and the potential spread of Sharia from sea to shining sea. Read more
Why Do Feminists Attack Sarah and Not Sharia?
Energy vote costly for Teague
Posted by
Michael Swickard
Labels:
New Mexico News,
U.S. Politics
0
comments
From the Politico.com - ARTESIA, N.M. – Rep. Harry Teague made an expensive decision last June when he supported Democratic leaders on climate change. The former oil man bucked his energy-producing home district to support Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s cap-and-trade legislation — a yes vote that cost him millions of dollars in lost business at his family’s company, which services the local oil and gas industry. And it’s a vote that ultimately could end up costing the House freshman his job. Teague stands out more than most Democrats when it comes to the climate change debate. Thanks to his conservative-minded and energy industry-driven constituency, he instantly landed atop the list of potential GOP pickup opportunities. Some local oil industry officials even targeted Teague’s company, which he’d built up from scratch into a multimillion-dollar business, marking him one of the richest members in Congress. “Immediately, everybody quit using his businesses,” said Lance Wilbanks, the CEO of Wilbanks Trucking in Artesia, who said he thought it was “sleazy” that Teague’s company changed its name after the climate vote in attempt to hedge some of its losses. Teague insisted that business has been slow around the region and wouldn’t say how much money he has lost at his company because of the climate vote. Teague’s public disclosure forms show his personal wealth fell from $40 million to $5 million during his first year in Congress. It’s a staggering loss, one that has some in New Mexico wondering about its effect on the freshman.Read more
Energy vote costly for Teague
ICE Chief Morton to Field: See No Illegal Aliens
Posted by
Michael Swickard
on Friday, August 20, 2010
Labels:
Border
1 comments
From the Center for Immigration Studies - By Jessica Vaughan - ICE's misleadingly-named Office of State and Local Cooperation (OSLC) has announced the next step in the Obama administration's efforts to drastically diminish the scope of immigration law enforcement. According to a draft policy document now being circulated among a limited group of stakeholders, ICE chief John Morton intends to prohibit not only his officers, but also local officers with 287(g) immigration authority, from busting illegal aliens who are discovered as a result of traffic violations. Morton has already implemented a "catch and release" policy, whereby ICE catches removable aliens in jails or through local arrests, and then releases all but the most serious offenders from custody. But this policy goes farther, stipulating that ICE will not even take a look at the illegal aliens who expose themselves to law enforcement by committing a traffic violation. And, neither will those local officers who have discovered lots of illegal aliens in the course of enforcing traffic laws. Read more
ICE Chief Morton to Field: See No Illegal Aliens
Mid-Afternoon Update on War in Mexico
Posted by
Jim Spence
Labels:
Border
0
comments
Mexico City police are investigating the murder of a businessman in the capital’s trendy Roma neighborhood after three gunmen broke into a bar after hours and fired 10 shots. Witnesses told police that the Bengala bar was closed when the gunmen forced an entry and shot Oscar Javier Paredes, said Armando Ortiz, a spokesman for the city attorney general’s office. Two other men were injured, including Paredes’s assistant.
Read more here:

Read more here:
Mid-Afternoon Update on War in Mexico
Federal Reserve Cuts Growth Forecast
Posted by
Jim Spence
Labels:
Economics
0
comments
The U.S. economy is contracting again, a sign that the recession never really ended, and the unemployment rate will exceed 10 percent, said David Rosenberg, chief economist at Gluskin Sheff & Associates Inc., a wealth management company, in Toronto. Second-quarter growth “looks as though it’s going to be revised down. We just had the Fed cut its forecast,” Rosenberg said today in an interview on Bloomberg Radio’s “The Hays Advantage” with Kathleen Hays, citing recent economic indicators. “We’re really building in something that’s negative for the third quarter,” he said. “My sense is the (economy) will contract in the fourth quarter as well.” Read more here:

Federal Reserve Cuts Growth Forecast
EEOC - We Are Not Making This Up
Posted by
Jim Spence
Labels:
National News
0
comments
![]() |
| Unidentified EEOC Commissioner |
EEOC - We Are Not Making This Up
War in Mexico Rages in All States
Posted by
Jim Spence
Labels:
Border
0
comments
![]() |
| Mexican President Felipe Calderon |
War in Mexico Rages in All States
Border War - More U.S. Government Insanity
Posted by
Jim Spence
Labels:
Border
0
comments
From the El Paso Times - ACALA, Texas -- On each side of a towering West Texas stretch of the $2.4 billion border fence designed to block people from illegally entering the country, there are two metal footbridges, clear paths into the United States from Mexico. The footpaths that could easily guide illegal immigrants and smugglers across the Rio Grande without getting wet seem to be there because of what amounts to federal linguistics. While just about anyone would call them bridges, the U.S.-Mexico group that owns them calls them something else. Read more here:

Border War - More U.S. Government Insanity




