The Fracking Facts

Aubrey McClendon
Newsnm note - Spence - Below is a transcript of the Keynote Address by Aubrey K. McClendon. He is Co-Founder, Chairman and CEO, Chesapeake Energy Corporation. He made this speech at the Marcellus Shale Insights Conference, in Philadelphia on September 7, 2011. It contains the FACTS about the process known as "fracking" now under attack by anti-fossil fuel types who are pressing their radical nonsense agendas.
"It’s great to be in the City of Brotherly Love. From the greeting I received outside, I can see how the city earned its nickname! And I must say it made me proud to be an American. Only in this, the freest country in
the world, can people express their opinions enthusiastically and publicly. That holds for the so-called “fractivists” protesting outside and the “factivists” in this room. When I say “factivist,” I mean all of you who share a commitment to use knowledge and common sense to safely and responsibly produce the natural gas our country so desperately needs. Because we understand this industry, we also have an obligation to speak out – not just at this conference, but out in the community. The facts we convey about the safety of our operations and the benefits of our product should kindle the hopes and calm the fears of all who are fair minded. But as we all have discovered in recent years, not everyone we meet is fair minded, or honest about their motives. In a country where freedom of speech and freedom of the press are enshrined in the Constitution, the privilege of unfettered speech can lead to unfettered fear mongering… In addition, the privilege of uncensored publishing – if not balanced by rigorous fact checking – can lead to broad distribution of half truths and outright lies. I am reminded of the famous words of a truly great U.S. Senator from New York and an Ambassador to the United Nations, Daniel Patrick Moynihan, who observed that, “Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts.”
So let’s talk about the facts. FACT: The company that I lead, Chesapeake Energy, is the most active driller in the Marcellus and the most active driller in the United States, by a factor of more than two. We employ over 12,000 Americans directly and almost 100,000 indirectly. We have been horizontally drilling and hydraulically fracturing wells since I co-founded the company in 1989. Our company has performed this process 16,000 times – the most of any company in the world. And we are getting better at it with every well. Not only are we getting better economically, we’re getting better in terms of protective barriers, water management, wastewater recycling and air quality improvement.
FACT: The natural gas exploration and production industry has an excellent track record of safety and environmental integrity. Over 1.2 million wells have been fracked by our industry since 1949. Against that track record of over 1.2 million frac jobs performed by the industry, our critics can only find one or two instances of alleged groundwater pollution. And having examined those few instances ourselves, we don't agree that fracking had anything to do with the alleged groundwater contamination. Even in the limited gas migration incidents in Pennsylvania in the past three years that have drawn so much media attention, only a couple of dozen homeowners claim to have been affected – and these incidents were not related to fracking. They were related to issues of casing design." Read rest of speech here: News New Mexico

Share/Bookmark

The Politics of 9-11

Ten years after the 9-11 attacks on America a question remains. What else can be done by civilized countries all around the world to confront the worldwide threat of radical Islam?
After the terrible problem of radical Islam landed in President Obama's lap in January of 2009, the discourse on this most pressing problem finally moved a bit beyond the partisan-obsessed “hatred” of warring domestic political opponents.
But some political residue remains. Clearly the personal and political hatred for George W. Bush retarded the process of problem-solving for years. Often it had been suggested by high profile Bush-haters that the nasty problem with radical Islam was simply overblown. Some even suggested (former Obama Green Jobs Czar Van Jones and actor Charlie Sheen) that President Bush actually knew in advance about the attacks and did nothing about his advance knowledge for "political gain." 
The history of evidence of the ongoing threat of radical Islam spans decades. There were mass murders at the Olympics at Munich in 1972, hostage taking at the U.S. embassy in Tehran in 1979, the murder of 250 peace-keeping U.S. Marines in Beirut during the 1980’s, mass murder over Lockerbie, Scotland, countless hijack killings, the deadly World Trade Center bombing of 1993, the U.S.S. Cole bombing, the deadly nightclub explosion in Bali, train bombings in London and then again in Spain in 2005, the most recent murder plot foiled by Scotland Yard on August 10, 2006 (which hoped to blow up as many as ten loaded passenger jets leaving London with liquid explosives), and of course the nearly 3,000 murders on 9-11. In recent years there have been many more attacks including an attack at Fort Hood, Texas that killed 13 and wounded 29. Still, until President Obama replaced George Bush in the White House, many Bush haters remained relatively comfortable in denying that there actually was an overwhelming threat to world peace posed by radical Islam.
Throughout history acknowledging  the reality of an “external threat” has always had a strengthening effect on incumbent political leaders. And politically speaking, it is an undeniable truth that in a philosophically divided nation, George W. Bush derived virtually all of his resurgence of political support amongst independents immediately AFTER radical Islam attacked America on 9-11. There can be little doubt that this horrible “external threat” posed by radical Islam helped Bush more than any other single factor, to become a two-term president.
With this psychological backdrop in mind, it is easier to understand why for the Bush-hating partisans, 9-11 was particularly painful “political event.” And accordingly, for Bush-haters, to actually admit that 9-11 is still the defining moment of 21st century history requires a concession that America actually had a real enemy that Bush had to fight. Reluctantly one must conclude that even the basic “premise” that radical Islam is a threat, created an reality pathway that no Bush-hating partisan wanted to start down. Denial became the preferred path for many.
Fast-forwarding to the present, with President Obama as Commander and Chief, the “communications interception tactics,” (like those used by Scotland Yard to thwart the plane bombings in London several years ago) have continued. And these preventive actions have continued with far fewer objections from the partisan ACLU and other Bush-haters. This has been good news for national security. Reality has jolted President Obama. And he is on the record now of saying he admired President Bush for reminding people of who America’s real “enemy is (al Queada - radical Islam). Earlier this week, former Vice President Dick Cheney gave great credit to President Obama for following through on the effort to bring Osama bin Laden to justice. At some point, and regardless of political leanings, all citizens must face the reality that radical Islam is like an inoperable cancer that still grows on the body we call the human race. There is no question that the acts of organized hatred that radical Islam is sworn to perpetuate, are dangerous to the freedoms of all civilized societies.
And so it is on the 10th anniversary of 9-11 that we reach the inescapable conclusion that the very process of engaging in “hatred,” whether it is partisan, religious, or some other form, will always cloud the judgments of any human being. Citizens who swear allegiance to best practices and never support dumb ideas or engage in illogical denials of basic facts based on political party considerations, are a far too precious commodity.
Today we will again see the chilling images of the towers collapse. We will also see images from Shanksville, Pennsylvania and the Pentagon. Finally we will see images of Presidents Bush and Obama and the First Ladies as they overlook Ground Zero. And as we do so we should all know that the 9-11 attacks should have never been about politics. However, like everything else, if we as a people allow moments in history to be about politics, they will be about politics.

Share/Bookmark

Malkin - All the Wrong 9-11 Lessons

Michelle Malkin
Townhall - Are your kids learning the right lessons about 9/11? Ten years after Osama bin Laden's henchmen murdered thousands of innocents on American soil, too many children have been spoon-fed the thin gruel of progressive political correctness over the stiff antidote of truth. "Know your enemy, name your enemy" is a 9/11 message that has gone unheeded. Our immigration and homeland security policies refuse to profile jihadi adherents at foreign consular offices and at our borders. Our military leaders refuse to expunge them from uniformed ranks until it's too late (see: Fort Hood massacre). The j-word is discouraged in Obama intelligence circles, and the term "Islamic extremism" was removed from the U.S. national security strategy document last year.
Similarly, too many teachers refuse to show and tell who the perpetrators of 9/11 were and who their heirs are today. My own daughter was one year old when the Twin Towers collapsed, the Pentagon went up in flames and Shanksville, Pa., became hallowed ground for the brave passengers of United Flight 93. In second grade, her teachers read touchy-feely stories about peace and diversity to honor the 9/11 dead. They whitewashed Osama bin Laden, militant Islam and centuries-old jihad out of the curriculum.
Apparently, the youngsters weren't ready to learn even the most basic information about the evil masterminds of Islamic terrorism. Mary Beth Hicks, author of the new book "Don't Let the Kids Drink the Kool-Aid," points to a recent review of 10 widely used textbooks in which the concepts of jihad and sharia were either watered down or absent. These childhood experts have determined that grade school is too early to delve into the specifics of the homicidal clash of Allah's sharia-avenging soldiers with the freedom-loving Western world. Yet, many of the same protectors of fragile elementary-school pupils can't wait to teach them all the ins and outs of condoms, cross-dressers and crack addictions. Read full column here: News New Mexico

Share/Bookmark

Progressives Case: De-Authorizing War on Terror

John Nichols
The Nation - by John Nichols - Just as the voice of Mary Robinson -- then serving in her UN High Commissioner role -- was a lonely one in opposition to declaring a "war on terror" that would define a decade for the world, so Congresswoman Barbara Lee was the lonely voice of the U.S. Congress. Lee cast the sole vote against Public Law 107-40, the Authorization of the Use of Military Force Against Terrorists, which effectively launched what is now know as the "war on terror. September 11 changed the world. Our deepest fears now haunt us," Congresswoman Lee said on September 14. "Yet I am convinced that military action will not prevent further acts of international terrorism against the United States. (We) must be careful not to embark on an open-ended war with neither an exit strategy nor a focused target," Lee concluded. "We cannot repeat past mistakes."
That wise counsel was not heeded. Cheney's "war on terror" language carried not just the day but the decade. But, now that the decade is done, Lee is back with a proposal to draw down the "war on terror."
Barbara Lee
"In reflecting on the rush-to-war in Afghanistan and President Bush's misguided war-of-choice in Iraq, my worst fears have unfortunately been realized," Lee said when she introduced legislation to sunset and repeal over a six-month period the 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Terrorists. "Over the last (decade), this broad authorization of force has had far-reaching implications which shake the very foundations of our great nation and democracy. It has been used to justify warrantless surveillance and wiretapping activities, indefinite detention practices that fly in the face of our constitutional values, extrajudicial targeted-killing operations, and a policy of borderless and open-ended war that threatens to indefinitely extend U.S. military engagement around the world," the congresswoman says. "It is time for Congress to reexamine, and ultimately repeal this flawed authorization. The alternative, to concede Congress's constitutional responsibilities and blindly accept the persistence of war without end, is unacceptable." Lee is right.
Her proposal has for the most part been neglected by the same media that has celebrated Cheney in recent weeks. But Lee has a few more allies as we approach September 14, 2011, than she did on September 11, 2001. Her proposal has been cosponsored by Democratic Representatives John Conyers Jr. (Michigan), Donna Edwards (Maryland), Keith Ellison (Minnesota), Bob Filner (California), Raul Grijalva (Arizona), Mike Honda (California), Dennis Kucinich (Ohio), Jesse Jackson Jr. (Illinois), John Lewis (Georgia), Jim McDermott (Washington), Pete Stark (California), Maxine Waters (California) and Lynn Woolsey (California). One Republican, North Carolina's Walter Jones Jr., has joined them. It is still lonely to speak out against the declaration of a "war on terrorism." But it is a little less lonely today than it was a decade ago. And our media could -- and should -- make it less lonely by highlighting the current legislative initiative of the woman who got it right on September 14, 2001. Read full story here: News New Mexico
Share/Bookmark

"Tastes Like Justice"


Share/Bookmark

NMSU Beats Big Ten Minnesota on the Road

DeWayne Walker
DeWayne Walker’s New Mexico State Aggie football team was embarrassed at home last week against Ohio University. And things didn’t figure to get any better this week in Minnesota when Walker’s squad took on a Big Ten team that lost by only two points on the road at mighty USC a week ago. It really didn’t work out too well for the Golden Gophers. The Aggies, led by sophomore quarterback Andrew Manley and star wide receiver Taveon Rogers played their best game in years. NMSU never trailed in the game and when the final gun sounded NMSU had delivered a stunning 28-21 upset of Minnesota before a hushed crowd.
Manning finished a great day going 20 for 30 through the air for 297 yards and three touchdowns. Four of Manning's passes were completed to Taveon Rogers for 88 yards and two scores. The game came down to a fourth down and ten situation for Minnesota at the Aggie 25 yard line with twenty seconds to go when Minnesota head coach Jerry Kill suddenly collapsed on the sideline. Kill, who has a medical history of suffering seizures was tended to for twenty minutes while both teams kneeled in prayer and the stadium fell silent. Coach Kill was taken to a local hospital where he was reportedly in stable condition. When play finally resumed the Aggie defense got the stop on the big 4th down play and a subdued celebration began on the NMSU sideline with all in attendance mindful of the condition of the Gophers coach in mind. It was easily DeWayne Walker’s biggest win as NMSU’s head coach. The Aggies return to Las Cruces for a home engagement with archrival UTEP next Saturday at Aggie Memorial Stadium. Read game recap here and box score here.

Share/Bookmark

Dam Jobs Bill


Share/Bookmark

$535 Million and Counting, Obama's "Green Job Investment" in Solyndra is the Gift That Keeps on Taking

Former "Green Jobs Czar" - Van Jones
Iwatchnews - Federal agents have expanded their examination of the now-bankrupt California solar power company Solyndra, visiting the homes of the company's chief executive, a founder, and a former executive, examining computer files and documents, the Center for Public Integrity's iWatch News and ABC News have learned. Agents visited the homes of CEO Brian Harrison and company founder Chris Gronet. Agents also visited the home of a third executive involved in the company from the start, according to a source who agreed to speak only on condition of anonymity because of the legal sensitivity of the situation. Gronet, reached at his home Friday morning, did not dispute that his home was visited by federal agents a day earlier.
“I’m sorry,” Gronet said in an interview. “You probably understand full well that I cannot comment.” Solyndra spokesman David Miller confirmed agents visited Harrison’s home on Thursday, when the FBI and Energy Department Inspector General arrived at the company's headquarters in Fremont, Calif., seizing boxes of records. “Yeah, they did go to his house and speak to him briefly,” Miller said. “I don’t know what they may have taken. I believe they took a look at his computer.” They took nothing from the house, he added. Read full story here: News New Mexico
Share/Bookmark

NMSU Enrollment Drops

KOB - TV - New Mexico State University officials say student enrollment is down across the state, declining nearly 20 percent at one campus. The Carlsbad Current -Argus reports that official announced Thursday that Fall 2011 census numbers showing 1.2 percent drop in enrollment at NMSU campuses from the all-time high recorded last fall. NMSU Grants was hit hard by declining enrollment and tallied 1,257 students, a decrease of 19.6 percent. NMSU Alamogordo's enrollment was 3,372, down 12.5 percent. The Carlsbad campus enrollment declined more than 7 percent. Read full story here: News New Mexico
Share/Bookmark

Ten Years Later, Lujan Just Doesn't Get It

Ben Lujan
In the face of multiple indictments of crime rings accused of duping the State of New Mexico so thousands of people who have entered the country illegally can obtain driver's licenses that provide the appearance of legitimacy, NM Speaker of the House Ben Lujan wants to revive an idea that has already been soundly rejected as inadequate. Instead of simply allowing an up or down vote on a corrective bill that was overwhelmingly approved during this year's 60 day legislative session, Speaker Lujan's bill seeks to "reduce the number years" before these dubious driver's licenses expire. Given that the anniversary of 9-11  is approaching, Lujan is rolling the political dice. Seven years ago the bi-partisan 9-11 Commission called for driver's license issuance reforms that Lujan seems to insist on ignoring. Will he get away with this approach? Only time will tell. His position seems doubly suspect with fresh evidence suggesting these previously mentioned crime rings are bringing people to New Mexico for less than 24 hours to game the New Mexico system.
9-11 Hijacker Mohammed Atta's License
The speaker's proposal is actually very similar to what was loosely characterized as a "compromise" bill that failed in the House earlier this year. Lujan's new bill (HB 22), which can be seen here, also adds a few additional document requirements to the process and some after-the-fact penalties to those who are sure to be long gone before what they have done is uncovered.
Thus far, early reports on this year's "special session" seem to suggest the legislature is moving at a snail's pace. Costs for the stalling is forcing taxpayers to foot a $50,000 per day tab. And there are no reports coming from the Democratic Party caucus in the NM Senate suggesting there is much attention being paid to the wishes of the voters on driver's licenses. Instead, Senate Democrats seem to be taking their cues on their positions from Senate Majority Leader Michael Sanchez. Minus Senator John Arthur Smith of Luna County, who is as independent as Representative Andy Nunez, every other Democrat in the NM Senate seems to be fine with the hopes that voters are not paying attention. Readers who are paying attention and want to assert their concerns can find contact information on their legislators here should they want to send a message to them and voice their concerns.

Share/Bookmark