Burglary Can Pay for Your Heirs in Colorado Springs

Gazette - An El Paso County jury on Friday awarded nearly $300,000 to the daughter of a burglar who was fatally shot in 2009 while breaking into an auto lot. Parents of the victim, Robert Johnson Fox, embraced their attorneys after a judge announced the jury’s verdict, capping a two-week-long civil trial in which business owner Jovan Milanovic and two relatives were painted as vigilantes who plotted a deadly ambush rather than let authorities deal with a string of recent burglaries. Phillip and Sue Fox, who filed suit for wrongful death in 2010 on behalf of Fox’s 3-year-old daughter, called the jury’s award a victory in their fight to seek accountability for the death of their son, who they say never posed a threat to the heavily armed men.
“Rob was in the wrong place doing the wrong thing, but the punishment didn’t fit the crime,” Sue Fox said afterward. “I can’t excuse his actions, but he didn’t deserve to be executed.” The exact amount of the award was $269,500, for factors such as loss of companionship and loss of future earnings. The family will also be awarded some of the costs associated with the more than yearlong legal battle. The jury of three men and three women deliberated for 2½ days over closely contested testimony about the predawn shooting on April 19, 2009. Fox, 20, was shot after he and a friend scaled a fence to get inside Southwest Auto Sales at 2444 Platte Place in the city’s Knob Hill neighborhood. According to the accomplice, Brian Corbin, they had smoked methamphetamine and were looking to steal anything to buy more drugs. Read full story here: News New Mexico

Share/Bookmark

1 comments:

Anonymous said...

Why does it not surprise many that a jury of "entitlement mentality" El Pasoans decided to grant a handout to a thief's surviving family? How does a jury determine the earning potential of a thief hopelessly hooked on crystal meth? Seriously, only the O.J. Simpson jury surpasses this jury in their collective lack of intellect. Maybe the award was calculated by taking into account the amount of goods and services the thief could have stolen and fenced in a lifetime... between prison sentences. Only in America can a common thief/drug addict be rewarded for the injuries he suffers at the hands of victims who were protecting their property. Is it any wonder lawyers and criminals are regarded with equal disrespect by law abiding citizens?

Post a Comment