Harry Reid |
President Barack Obama, his debt commission, the pundits, our creditors and many in the Democratic Party all agree that reforms to Medicare and Social Security are necessary to prevent the insolvency of those programs -- and this nation. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.), however, chooses instead to play games by telling the American people that the House wanted to “end Medicare as we know it.” Reid chose scare tactics -- saying that the House was “trying to balance the budget on the backs of seniors to pay for tax loopholes for the rich." He knows full well that the House-passed budget not only saves Medicare, but also closes the tax loopholes he and his fellow Senate Democrats keep talking about. With 21 Senate Democrats up for re-election, Reid chose to place a higher value on political theater than on protecting seniors, job creators and the "full faith and credit" of the United States of America. The consequences of Senate inaction are real and have led to continuing resolutions, threats of government shutdowns and, now, the nation's first credit downgrade.
There is no more time for dithering. There is no more time for politics. It is time for the Senate to act. The Senate must present its plan -- if it has one, or figure out how to work with the House to solve America’s challenges. As a first simple step, the Senate should do what 75 percent of the American people want it to do: It should join the House in passing a Balanced Budget Amendment to the Constitution -- so that U.S. taxpayers can never be put in this position again. We, the Republican freshmen, were elected to fundamentally change the way things are being done in Washington. We are making the tough decisions necessary to ensure that we remain the greatest and most prosperous nation in the world. We simply need a Senate that will get to work and join us in this effort. This is signed by the following 39 members of the House Republican freshman class: Rich Nugent, Raúl Labrador, Austin Scott, Bill Flores, Mike Kelly, Steven Palazzo, Bob Gibbs, Rob Woodall, Tim Scott, Mike Pompeo, Paul Gosar, Tim Griffin, Andy Harris, Jeff Landry, James Lankford, Chris Gibson, Robert Hurt, Nan Hayworth, Chuck Fleischmann, Bill Huizenga, Blake Farenthold, Martha Roby, Sean Duffy, Mo Brooks, Ann Marie Buerkle, Allen West, Bill Johnson, Scott Rigell, Joe Walsh, Randy Hultgren, Steve Pearce, Frank Guinta, Jeff Denham, Diane Black, Kristi Noem, Reid Ribble, Sandy Adams, Steve Womack and Steve Stivers.
1 comments:
The clause "full faith and credit" in the Constitution is NOT about money. It does not apply to the federal government. It is the clause that requires states to recognize the public acts, records, and judicial proceedings of the other states. (Article IV, Section 1)
Why would you use something incorrect?
The federal government is given the simple allowance of borrowing on the credit of the United States. (Article I, Section 8) The federal government however is limited to spending, and thus borrowing, for only threee objects. The Congress may spend to pay the debts of the United States. The Congress may spend to provide for the common defence, not individual defence, of the United States. And lastly Congress may spend for the general Welfare of the United States. Note that Congress cannot spend anything on local programs, i.e. NO PORK AT ALL. Congress cannot spend money for individual welfare. The welfare of individuals is not part of Congress authority or concern. The Constitution is a set of rules that We the People put in place to control the federal government. In the Constitution, We the People through our States move some powers from the States to a centralized limited government to manage interactions among the nations of the Earth, and to protect ALL the states from external forces. No mas!!
Post a Comment