Steve Pearce |
We pay for natural gas so that we can cook and heat our homes, and we rely on those services. Consumers cannot just switch providers as with other products—public service companies have a responsibility to deliver in any circumstances. While there are reasonable explanations, there is no acceptable justification for the failure to deliver natural gas service to the people of New Mexico during the recent winter weather. First and foremost, New Mexicans must be made whole. I commend those few companies that have taken the leadership to establish compensation funds. However, others have yet to publicly show that they understand the impact that losing natural gas service had on so many New Mexicans. I hope they will rethink their position.
It is time for answers. We have already begun to understand what happened—what some have called “a perfect storm.” In Texas, the adverse weather conditions disrupted dozens of power generating units, causing rolling blackouts. Gas processing plants were left without power, wellheads and lines froze, and demand skyrocketed. As a result, even though we had gas in volume, we did not have the pressure needed to get it into homes.
But even once we answer the questions of “why,” the more pressing question is “how”—how can we avoid this sort of crisis in the future? Were rolling blackouts the best approach, or should power have been maintained in the areas that run our gas lines? Are we too reliant on energy from outside New Mexico? If our electricity came from other sources, could this have been avoided? I am pleased to see my colleagues in the New Mexico congressional delegation seeking answers at the U.S. Senate field hearing in Albuquerque on Monday. We will inevitably face another storm of these proportions, and when we do, we must be prepared. New Mexicans don’t ask for much; we just don’t want to be left out in the cold.
1 comments:
As much as I like Steve Pearce, I have to call him on one part of this statement, "... In Texas, low temperatures and a lack of wind stopped wind turbines from generating energy, causing rolling blackouts. ..."
Umm, No. From MasterResource http://www.masterresource.org/2011/02/texas-winter-power-outages-ercot/
" ... ERCOT spokesperson Dottie Roark said that wind power plants from between 3,500 to 4,000 MW of power during the worst parts of the emergency, about normal for this time of year. ..."
Per JavalinaTex's comment #2, the problem with NG occured because a lot of compressor stations have shifted from site-generated to utility power in order to meet air pollution requirements. Personally, I'll bet that any existing emergency generators did not auto-start or the automatic bus transfer switches failed in the cold weather.
I'm not a wind power supporter by any streatch of the imagination, but per ERCOT, less than 1% of the 82 power plants that went offline were wind-powered: http://fuelfix.com/blog/2011/02/14/ercot-blackout-changes-already-made-to-emergency-procedures/
Note: All 4 nuclear power plants, South Texas 1 & 2 and Comanche Peak 1 & 2, ran at 100% power throughout the cold snap.
Post a Comment